地理与地理信息科学

需要加快形成适应新质生产力发展的新型文旅生产关系,使新质生产力成为文旅融合高质量发展的着力点。本文以2008—2022年中国31个省域为研究对象,采用哈肯模型测度我国新质生产力与文旅融合协同演化特征,并通过定性比较分析方法识别两者协同发展的路径组合。结果表明:(1)2008—2015年文旅融合作为主导序参量,两者协同水平并未出现明显提升,地区非均衡化发展态势鲜明;(2)2016—2022年新质生产力作为主导序参量,全国整体协同水平上升趋势明显,但由东向西的阶梯递减格局并未改变;(3)文旅融合主导下的协同演化趋势呈现出强者愈强和弱者愈弱的“剪刀差”形态,而新质生产力主导下的协同演化趋势则呈现出“平行线”形态,具有较强的“鲁棒性”特征;(4)两者协同演化的提升路径可归纳为要素补位、政策补位和供需双元驱动。

For new quality productive forces to serve as a lever for high-quality cultural-tourism integration,it is essential to accelerate the formation of a new type of production relations in the cultural-tourism industries that is compatible with the development of new quality productive forces.Using panel data from 31 Chinese provinces from 2008 to 2022,this study applies the Haken model to measure the collaborative evolution characteristics of new quality productive forces and cultural-tourism integration in China.Qualitative comparative analysis(QCA) is further employed to identify the pathway configurations that lead to their coordinated development.It is found as follows.(1) From 2008 to 2015,cultural-tourism integration acted as the dominant order parameter,yet the synergistic effect between the two systems did not improve significantly,and regional disparities remained pronounced.(2) From 2016 to 2022,new quality productive forces became the dominant order parameter,playing a leading role in driving the coordinated development.Although the overall coordinated development level across the country showed a clear upward trend,the stepwise decreasing pattern from east to west remained unchanged.(3)Under the dominance of cultural-tourism integration,the collaborative evolution exhibited a "scissors-gap" pattern,where stronger regions grew stronger and weaker regions fell further behind.In contrast,under the dominance of new quality productive forces,the collaborative evolution displayed a "parallel-line" pattern,demonstrating stronger robustness.(4)The pathways for enhancing the collaborative evolution can be summarized into three types:factor compensation,policy compensation,and dual drive of supply and demand.