nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2024, 05, v.40 115-123+152
长三角城市群旅游高质量发展与居民共同富裕协调发展研究
基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金项目(41771162)
邮箱(Email): jdwzf@126.com;
DOI:
发布时间: 2024-09-12
出版时间: 2024-09-12
网络发布时间: 2024-09-12
移动端阅读
摘要:

旅游高质量发展是促进居民共同富裕的有效途径,而推进实现共同富裕目标能进一步提升旅游高质量发展水平,二者协调发展有利于实现中国式现代化。该文采用变异系数法和综合评价法测度2010—2020年长三角城市群各地市旅游高质量发展、居民共同富裕发展水平,并利用耦合协调度模型、同步发展模型明晰两系统间的耦合协调状况及相对滞后因素,最后引入探索性空间数据分析、标准差椭圆探究两系统间耦合协调的时空演变特征及发展趋势。结果表明:研究期内长三角城市群旅游高质量发展与居民共同富裕耦合协调水平属于中等偏低水平,整体呈现“上升—下降—上升—下降”的周期性波动,极差(0.41~0.63)较大;市域尺度下两系统耦合协调度在失调与协调之间反复变化,大多数地市两系统发展基本同步;两系统耦合协调度空间分布呈现出“东部高、西部低”的分异特征,热点区集中分布于长江入海口地市,冷点区聚集于长三角城市群西部,呈“西北—东南”方向性特征且随着时间演变愈加显著,耦合协调中心具有向东偏移趋势。

Abstract:

The high-quality development of tourism is an effective way to promote the common prosperity of residents, and promoting the residents′ common prosperity can further improve the level of high-quality tourism development.The coordinated development of the two is conducive to the realization of Chinese path to modernization.Taking the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration as the research object, the coefficient of variation and comprehensive evaluation method are used to measure the development level of high-quality tourism development and common prosperity of residents in cities of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration from 2010 to 2020.Then the coupling coordination degree model and synchronous development model are used to clarify the coupling coordination status and relative lag factors between the two systems.Finally, exploratory spatial data analysis and standard deviational ellipse are used to explore the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and trends of the coupling and coordination between the two systems.The results are shown as follows.(1) During the study period, the average coupling coordination level of high-quality tourism development and common prosperity of residents in the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration fluctuated between 0.39 and 0.49,belonging to a medium low level, with a large range, floating between 0.41 and 0.63,showing a cyclical change of "rise-fall-rise-fall".(2) The coupling coordination degree of the two system fluctuated repeatedly between imbalance and coordination at the urban scale, and the high-quality tourism development and the development of residents′ common prosperity in most cities of the urban agglomeration were basically synchronized.(3) The coupling coordination degree of the two systems had obvious spatial differentiation characteristics of "high in the east, low in the west",and the coupling coordination center had a tendency to move eastward.The hot spots of the coupling coordination degree were concentrated in the cities at the estuary of the Yangtze River Delta, while cold spots were concentrated in the cities in the western region of the Yangtze River Delta urban agglomeration.

参考文献

[1] 张广海,刘二恋,董跃蕾.中国区域共同富裕实践中乡村旅游作用机制[J].自然资源学报,2023,38(2):387-402.

[2] MARTIN F.A hedonic price model for ski lift tickets[J].Tourism Management,2008,29(6):1172-1184.

[3] LIU L L,YANG Q.Spatial econometric analysis of the relationship between Chinese tourism industry agglomeration and economic growth[J].Agro Food Industry Hi Tech,2017,28(1):2754-2758.

[4] LASANTA T,LAGUNA M,VICENTE S S M.Do tourism-based ski resorts contribute to the homogeneous development of the Mediterranean mountains?A case study in the Central Spanish Pyrenees[J].Tourism Management,2007,28(5):1326-1339.

[5] PANPAN R.Hot spots and trends of industrial tourism research at home and abroad:based on CiteSpace visualization and analysis[J].Journal of Global Economy,Business and Finance,2023,5(8):67-75.

[6] IRMGARD L B.Improving global health is tourism′s role in poverty elimination perpetuating poverty,powerlessness and ′ill-being′[J].Global Public Health,2017,12(1):1-20.

[7] PARK K,RIGOLON A,CHOI D A,et al.Transit to parks:an environmental justice study of transit access to large parks in the U.S.West[J].Urban Forestry & Urban Greening,2021(4):127055.

[8] 柯晓兰.乡村旅游高质量发展的困境及路径优化:基于四川省17县(区)25个乡镇的调查[J].资源开发与市场,2021,37(10):1247-1255.

[9] 谢珈,马晋文,朱莉.乡村振兴背景下我国乡村文化旅游高质量发展的思考[J].企业经济,2019,38(11):88-92.

[10] 张祝平.以文旅融合理念推动乡村旅游高质量发展:形成逻辑与路径选择[J].南京社会科学,2021(7):157-164.

[11] 周丽,蔡张瑶,黄德平.西部民族地区乡村旅游高质量发展的现实需求、丰富内涵和实现路径[J].农村经济,2021(6):137-144.

[12] 王兆峰,邹佳.乡村旅游高质量发展与共同富裕的动态耦合协调演化:以张家界为例[J].湖南师范大学自然科学学报,2024,47(1):74-83.

[13] 宋子千.科技引领“十四五”旅游业高质量发展[J].旅游学刊,2020,35(6):10-12.

[14] 王松茂,褚玉静,郭安禧,等.“一带一路”沿线重点省份旅游经济高质量发展研究:基于旅游资源转换效率的测度[J].地理科学,2020,40(9):1505-1512.

[15] 刘英基,韩元军.要素结构变动、制度环境与旅游经济高质量发展[J].旅游学刊,2020,35(3):28-38.

[16] 张新成,梁学成,宋晓,等.黄河流域旅游产业高质量发展的失配度时空格局及成因分析[J].干旱区资源与环境,2020,34(12):201-208.

[17] 屈小爽,徐文成.旅游业与生态环境协调及高质量发展:基于黄河流域研究[J].技术经济与管理研究,2021(10):123-128.

[18] 杜岩,李世泰,杨洋.山东省乡村旅游高质量发展与乡村振兴耦合协调发展研究[J].湖南师范大学自然科学学报,2022,45(3):22-32.

[19] 刘培林,钱滔,黄先海,等.共同富裕的内涵、实现路径与测度方法[J].管理世界,2021,37(8):117-129.

[20] 谭燕芝,王超,陈铭仕,等.中国农民共同富裕水平测度及时空分异演变[J].经济地理,2022,42(8):11-21.

[21] 陈燕.中国共产党的共同富裕:理论演进与实现路径[J].科学社会主义,2021(3):115-120.

[22] 白维军.以高质量社会保障助推共同富裕:逻辑关联、现实难题与关键路径[J].人民论坛·学术前沿,2022(16):37-45.

[23] 吕永刚.高质量发展促进共同富裕:出场逻辑、动力机制与关键路径[J].江海学刊,2022(3):90-96.

[24] 张朝枝,杨继荣.基于可持续发展理论的旅游高质量发展分析框架[J].华中师范大学学报(自然科学版),2022,56(1):43-50.

[25] 许建明,吕良瑞.农村社会保障赋能共同富裕的发展逻辑、现实挑战与实践路径[J].科学社会主义,2023(6):119-124.

[26] 周成,冯学钢,张旭红.中国旅游科技创新的时空结构、重心轨迹及其影响因素研究[J].世界地理研究,2022,31(2):418-427.

[27] 侯永康.对外开放影响旅游产业发展的机理探析[J].山西财经大学学报,2010,32(S2):155-156.

[28] 杨彬.发展全域旅游共享美好生活[J].旅游学刊,2020,35(2):1-3.

[29] 包剑飞,张杜鹃.旅游产业与区域经济耦合协调度研究:以长江三角洲城市群为例[J].广西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2020,38(3):117-127.

[30] 孙九霞,张凌媛,罗意林.共同富裕目标下中国乡村旅游资源开发:现状、问题与发展路径[J].自然资源学报,2023,38(2):318-334.

[31] 袁洪英,张广海.人口老龄化对我国旅游业高质量发展的影响及空间效应[J].资源开发与市场,2022,38(9):1137-1144.

[32] 肖黎明,李秀清.资源利用对长江经济带高质量发展的影响:基于生态足迹的检验[J].地理与地理信息科学,2022,38(4):104-112.

[33] 向云,陆倩,李芷萱.数字经济发展赋能共同富裕:影响效应与作用机制[J].证券市场导报,2022(5):2-13.

[34] 李玏,钱益春.促进农民农村共同富裕的浙江实践:成效、措施与启示[J].中南林业科技大学学报(社会科学版),2022,16(6):71-77.

[35] 马文博,陈昱.人口城镇化与土地城镇化的耦合协调关系及空间差异[J].统计与决策,2020,36(12):114-116.

[36] 李思楠,赵筱青,普军伟,等.西南喀斯特典型区国土空间功能质量评价及耦合协调分析:以广南县为例[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(9):2350-2367.

[37] 孙永胜,佟连军.东北限制开发区域开发强度与生态环境的时空耦合关系研究[J].地理科学,2021,41(4):68-694.

[38] 吴儒练.中国旅游效率与乡村振兴耦合协调测度及时空演化[J].地理与地理信息科学,2023,39(1):111-119.

[39] 程云,殷杰.中国旅游安全事件分布与引致因素[J].经济地理,2020,40(11):215-224.

[40] 于秋阳.长三角地区旅游业发展报告(2019)[R].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2020:214-235.

[41] 毕珊珊,李冬花,符琳蓉,等.长三角地区高质量发展评价[J].资源开发与市场,2022,38(8):955-963.

基本信息:

中图分类号:F592.7;F126

引用信息:

[1]许静,王兆峰.长三角城市群旅游高质量发展与居民共同富裕协调发展研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2024,40(05):115-123+152.

基金信息:

国家自然科学基金项目(41771162)

发布时间:

2024-09-12

出版时间:

2024-09-12

网络发布时间:

2024-09-12

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文