| 174 | 0 | 86 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
将边境地区生态经济社会协调发展模式嵌入现代化边境建设大格局，对筑牢国家西南边境生态安全屏障，实现稳边、固边、兴边、富边的可持续发展意义重大。本文运用生态系统健康评估方法和熵值法对1995—2020年西南边境地区生态、经济、社会系统综合发展水平进行评价，综合耦合协调度和脱钩弹性指数模型剖析生态—经济—社会复合系统的协调水平及协调发展类型。研究发现：(1)研究期内研究区生态系统健康水平略微波动上升，经济系统综合评价指数大幅上升，社会系统综合评价指数波动上升，均呈现明显的阶段性特征，具有显著的空间异质性和空间集聚性；(2)生态—经济—社会复合系统的耦合协调水平持续提高，反映出区域快速发展—稳步发展—高速发展—发展调整的阶段性特征；(3)生态—经济—社会复合系统的脱钩状态差异明显，生态系统与经济系统、生态系统与社会系统主要表现为相互约束的解耦关系，而经济系统与社会系统主要表现为相互促进的耦合关系；(4)生态—经济—社会复合系统协调类型呈现出由失调—社会衰退型为主演变为协调—生态衰退型和协调—增长型为主。在西南边境地区实现稳边、固边、兴边、富边的可持续发展目标过程中，应重视生态—经济—社会复合系统的协调发展水平，以此为基础分区分类制定适宜边境地区人地共生的发展政策。
Abstract：Embedding the coordinated development model of the ecological,economic and social systems in the border areas into the overall framework of modern border construction is of great significance for consolidating the ecological security barrier in the southwest border region in China and achieving sustainable development goals of stabilizing,strengthening,developing and enriching the border areas.This study evaluated the comprehensive development levels of the ecological,economic,and social systems in the southwest border region from 1995 to 2020 using the ecosystem health assessment method and the entropy method.By integrating the coupling coordination degree model and the decoupling elasticity index model,it further analyzed the coordination level and coordinated development types of the ecology-economy-society complex system.The findings are as follows.(1) During the study period,the ecosystem health level exhibited a slight fluctuating upward trend,while the comprehensive evaluation index of the economic system increased sharply and that of the social system fluctuated upward.All three systems showed obvious phased characteristics,as well as significant spatial heterogeneity and spatial agglomeration.(2)The coupling coordination level of the ecology-economy-society complex system continued to improve.These results reflect the phased characteristics of regional development:rapid development,stable development,high-speed development,and development adjustment.(3)The decoupling states of the ecology-economy-society complex system varied significantly.The relationships between the ecosystem and the economic system,as well as between the ecosystem and the social system,were mainly decoupled with mutual constraints,whereas the relationship between the economic system and the social system was mainly coupled with mutual promotion.(4)The dominant coordination types of the ecology-economy-society complex system evolved from "imbalance-social decline" type to "coordination-ecological decline" type and "coordination-growth" type.In the process of achieving the sustainable development goals of stabilizing,consolidating,developing,and enriching the southwest border region,attention should be paid to the coordinated development level of the ecology-economy-society complex system.On this basis,region-and category-specific development policies suitable for human-land symbiosis in border areas should be formulated.
[1]刘国华.西南生态安全格局形成机制及演变机理[J].生态学报,2016,36(22):7088-7091.
[2]Yang Bin,Ma Xiaohan,Li Jirong,et al.The relationship between high-quality development and ecosystem health in China's urban agglomerations[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2025,377:124720.DOI:10.1016/j.j envman.2025.124720.
[3]Tang Lingdong,Liang Gaodou,Gu Guanhai,et al.Study on the spatial-temporal evolution characteristics,patterns,and driving mechanisms of ecological environment of the ecological security barriers on China's land borders[J].Environmental Impact Assessment Review,2023,103:107267.DOI:10.1016/j.eiar.2023.107267.
[4]赵武生,石培基.基于InVEST模型的复合生态系统耦合协调关系研究:以兰西城市群为例[J].中国环境科学,2023,43(4):1883-1894.
[5]马世骏,王如松.社会—经济—自然复合生态系统[J].生态学报,1984,4(1):1-9.
[6]尹晓波.社会经济与生态协同发展预警系统分析[J].工业技术经济,2004(5):55-57.
[7]周成,金川,赵彪,等.区域经济—生态—旅游耦合协调发展省际空间差异研究[J].干旱区资源与环境,2016,30(7):203-208.
[8]温煜华.甘肃省生态—经济—社会系统耦合协调发展趋势及其影响因素[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2023(6):113-123.
[9]任祁荣,于恩逸.甘肃省生态环境与社会经济系统协调发展的耦合分析[J].生态学报,2021,41(8):2944-2953.
[10]张迎春,李阳,张世花.共融性发展:三江源国家公园生态—社会—经济耦合协调研究[J].青海民族大学学报(社会科学版),2023,49(1):85-92.
[11]江孝君,杨青山,耿清格,等.长江经济带生态—经济—社会系统协调发展时空分异及驱动机制[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(3):493-504.
[12]洪蕾,孙杰,刘冬,等.长三角中心城市群生态环境与社会经济耦合协调发展及其影响因素研究[J].生态与农村环境学报,2024,40(9):1155-1166.
[13]张洪,方文杰,陶柳延.长三角中心城市社会经济—生态环境—旅游产业协调发展时空演化及影响因素:基于面板数据的空间计量分析[J].华南师范大学学报(自然科学版),2021,53(5):84-91.
[14]黄颖利,孙晨,乔振华.生态保护修复视角下京津冀地区社会经济—生态环境系统耦合关系及影响机制[J].环境科学研究,2024,37(12):2824-2835.
[15]望元庆,宋书愉,王杰,等.2000—2018年内蒙古沙区“生态—经济—社会”复合系统脆弱性演变及关键影响因素[J].生态学报,2023,43(6):2271-2286.
[16]宫炳含,吕楠,武旭同,等.面向可持续发展目标的中国旱地社会—生态系统分类研究[J].生态学报,2025,45(10):4743-4757.
[17]高妍,冯起,李宗省.祁连山国家公园甘肃片区生态—经济—社会耦合协调发展评价[J].生态学杂志,2022,41(6):1197-1204.
[18]陈东军,虞虎,钟林生,等.国家公园建设背景下区域生态—经济—社会耦合协调发展评价:以神农架林区为例[J].资源科学,2023,45(2):417-427.
[19]徐盼盼,申艳军,彭建兵,等.基于生态—经济—社会协同发展理念的秦岭北麓峪道类型化架构思考[J].地球科学,2024,49(12):4564-4575.
[20]罗万云,王福博,戎铭倩.国家重点生态功能区生态—经济—社会系统耦合协调的动态演化:以新疆阿勒泰地区为例[J].生态学报,2022,42(12):4729-4741.
[21]王琦,汤放华.洞庭湖区生态—经济—社会系统耦合协调发展的时空分异[J].经济地理,2015,35(12):161-167.
[22]江孝君,王小艳,杨青山.环渤海地区生态—经济—社会系统耦合协调时空演化特征及驱动机理[J].地理科学,2024,44(12):2155-2165.
[23]张生瑞,王英杰,鞠洪润,等.中国陆地边境旅游发展区域差异及其影响因素[J].地理研究,2020,39(2):414-429.
[24]宁志中,杨蕾蕾,钟林生.中国陆地边境地区入境旅游市场的时空特征研究[J].资源科学,2014,36(6):1125-1132.
[25]秦秋燕,陆汝成,段炼,等.中国陆地边境地区耕地利用综合效率时空格局与影响因素[J].中国农业资源与区划,2022,43(9):12-21.
[26]宋周莺,祝巧玲.中国边境地区的城镇化格局及其驱动力[J].地理学报,2020,75(8):1603-1616.
[27]王朋岗,王力,朱贺,等.基于分类视角的中国陆地边境地区人口发展状况及其对策[J].西北人口,2020,41(3):69-78.
[28]袁毛宁,刘焱序,王曼,等.基于“活力—组织力—恢复力—贡献力”框架的广州市生态系统健康评估[J].生态学杂志,2019,38(4):1249-1257.
[29]Ates A G,Bailey R C.Using land cover information in assessing the ecosystem health of streams[J].Landscape Ecology,2024,39(2):17.DOI:10.1007/s10980-024-01831-1.
[30]He Jianhua,Pan Zhenzhen,Liu Dianfeng,et al.Exploring the regional differences of ecosystem health and its driving factors in China[J].Science of the Total Environment,2019,673:553-564.
[31]Jian Peng,Liu Yanxu,Wu Jiansheng,et al.Linking ecosystem services and landscape patterns to assess urban ecosystem health:a case study in Shenzhen city,China[J].Landscape andUrban Planning,2015,143:56-68.
[32]闫语,秦耀伟,平玉荣,等.人类活动对生境质量的影响及空间关系定量分析:以石家庄为例[J].环境工程技术学报,2024,114(2):574-582.
[33]谢高地,甄霖,鲁春霞,等.一个基于专家知识的生态系统服务价值化方法[J].自然资源学报,2008,23(5):911-919.
[34]王妍,刘凯.基于夜间灯光数据的中国城市空间结构测度及其影响因素研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2025,41(2):47-55.
[35]虎海峰,孙勇,刘明凯,等.民族地区经济—社会—治理系统耦合协调效应评价与系统动力学仿真:以新疆为例[J].中国管理科学,2024,32(5):93-102.
[36]李秋雨,朱麟奇,王吉玉.全域旅游背景下吉林省旅游业—经济—社会—生态环境协调性研究[J].地理科学,2020,40(6):948-955.
[37]黄寿峰,邓宇铭.中国式现代化视域下中国财政收入目标制演变研究[J].社会科学研究,2024(2):1-15.
[38]宋涛,程艺,刘卫东,等.中国边境地缘经济的空间差异及影响机制[J].地理学报,2017,72(10):1731-1745.
[39]王颖,喻阳华,王芊姿.喀斯特地区生态修复的生态—经济—社会协调发展评价:以贵州省安顺市为例[J].环境科学与技术,2019,42(S2):286-295.
[40]王淑佳,孔伟,任亮,等.国内耦合协调度模型的误区及修正[J].自然资源学报,2021,36(3):793-810.
[41]高煜,李佳余.数字产业化和产业数字化的耦合协调度测度与分析[J].统计与决策,2023,39(18):119-124.
[42]苑清敏,郑少宇.区域产业脱钩弹性与低碳经济路径分析[J].环境科学与技术,2014,37(10):177-181.
[43]侯丽朋,王琳,钱瑶,等.“双碳”目标下闽三角碳排放脱钩状态及驱动机制分析[J].生态学报,2022,42(23):9663-9676.
[44]陈翠芳,孔雪松,朱思阳,等.基于脱钩模型的湖北省乡村人—耕—居变化关联模式分析[J].地理与地理信息科学,2021,37(1):59-65.
[45]贺圣达.大湄公河次区域合作:复杂的合作机制和中国的参与[J].南洋问题研究,2005(1):6-14.
[46]黄彩文,和光翰.中缅边境地区外籍劳务人员与边疆安全[J].学术探索,2016(8):56-61.
[47]任洪生.边境“难民及非法入境者”问题与中国的应对策略研究[J].国际展望,2017,9(5):41-62.
[48]马光选.靶向治理:中缅边境社会风险治理模式创新[J].湖北民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2020,38(3):23-30.
基本信息:
中图分类号:X24;F127
引用信息:
[1]郑可君,吴映梅.中国西南边境地区生态—经济—社会复合系统协调发展研究[J].地理与地理信息科学().
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金青年项目(23CMZ045)
2026-06-24
2026-06-24
2026-06-24