nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2020, 06, v.36 104-112
中国旅游效率的空间关联网络结构及其解释
基金项目(Foundation): 国家社科基金青年项目(19CGL030)
邮箱(Email): 2267798431@qq.com;
DOI:
摘要:

基于改进的DEA模型测度中国内地31省域的旅游效率,采用修正引力模型和社会网络分析法,构建旅游效率的空间关联关系,并深入探讨中国旅游效率空间关联网络结构的特征、传导机制及其影响因素。结果表明:1)2007-2016年中国省域旅游效率的空间关联关系呈现出复杂的网络结构;2)空间关联的整体网络结构特征上,旅游效率整体网络强度和网络关联性的时序演变呈现增强态势;3)空间关联的个体网络结构特征上,东部发达省域位于中心位置,易对其他省域产生影响但不易受其他省域影响,而中、西部省域处于网络结构的边缘地带,易受其他省域影响但不易对其他省域产生影响;4)空间关联的聚类特征上,第Ⅱ板块内部相关性较强,第Ⅰ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ板块内部相关性较弱,第Ⅰ和第Ⅲ板块、第Ⅱ和第Ⅳ板块间存在双向空间溢出关系;5)省域间经济发展水平相近、城镇化步伐一致、产业结构差异缩小、空间距离缩短、对外开放程度接近均对中国旅游效率空间关联网络结构有显著的正向影响。

Abstract:

Based on the improved DEA model to measure the tourism efficiency of 31 provincial administrative regions in China,the modified gravity model and the social network analysis were used to construct the spatial correlation of tourism efficiency,and the characteristics,transmission mechanism and influencing factors of spatial correlation network structure of China′s tourism efficiency were deeply discussed.The conclusions are as follows.1) The spatial relationship of provincial tourism efficiency in China from 2007 to 2016 presented a complex network structure.2) In terms of the overall network structure characteristics of spatial correlation,the temporal evolution of network strength and network correlations of tourism efficiency have shown an increasing trend.3) In terms of the individual network structure characteristics of spatial correlation,the eastern developed provincial administrative regions were centrally located,easy to influence other provincial administrative regions but not easy to be affected by them,while the central and western provincial administrative regions were at the edge of the network structure,easy to be affected by other provincial administrative regions but not easy to affect them.4) The internal correlation of plate Ⅱ is strong, while that of Plate Ⅰ,Ⅲ and Ⅳ is weak. There is a two-way spatial spillover relationship between plate I and plate Ⅲ as well as plate Ⅱ and plate Ⅳ. 5) The similar level of economic development among provinces,the coordination of urbanization,the narrowing of differences in industrial structure,the proximity of the degree of opening to the outside world and the shortening of spatial distance all have significant positive effects on the spatial correlation network structure of China′s tourism efficiency.

参考文献

[1] ASSAF A G.Bench marking the Asia Pacific tourism industry:A Bayesian combination of DEA and stochastic frontier[J].Tourism Management,2012,33(5):1122-1127.

[2] FUENTES R.Efficiency of travel agencies:A case study of Alicante,Spain[J].Tourism Management,2011,32(1):75-87.

[3] SARKIS J,TALLURI S.Performance based clustering for bench-marking of US airports[J].Transportation Research Part A,2004,38(5):329-346.

[4] BARRORS C P,BOTTI L,PEYPOCH N,et al.Performance of French destinations:Tourism attraction perspectives[J].Tourism Management,2011,32(1):141-146.

[5] MEDINA L F,IGNACIO G G,SANDRA M M.Measuring efficiency of sun & beach tourism destinations[J].Annals of Tourism Research,2012,39(2):1248-1251.

[6] ZHA J P,HE L M,LIU Y,et al.Evaluation on development efficiency of low-carbon tourism economy:A case study of Hubei Province,China[J].Socio-Economic Planning Sciences,2019,66(6):47-57.

[7] SHI H.The efficiency of government promotion of inbound tourism:The case of Australia[J].Economic Modelling,2012,29(6):2711-2718.

[8] BAKER M,RILEY M.New perspective on productivity in hotels:Some advances and new direction[J].International Journal of Hospitality Management,1994(4):297-311.

[9] DEL BARRIO M J,HERRERO L C,SANZ J á.Measuring the efficiency of heritage institutions:A case study of a regional system of museums in Spain[J].Journal of Cultural Heritage,2009,10(2):258-268.

[10] PENG H S,ZHANG J H,LU L,et al.Eco-efficiency and its determinants at a tourism destination:A case study of Huangshan National Park,China[J].Tourism Management,2017,60(6):201-211.

[11] 方叶林,娜塔莎,张天逸.考虑非期望产出的中国大陆星级饭店效率测度及其演化[J].旅游科学,2019,33(1):84-94.

[12] 胡宇娜,梅林,魏建国.中国区域旅行社业效率的时空分异及驱动机制[J].地理与地理信息科学,2017,33(3):91-97.

[13] 马震.基于数据包络分析的丝绸之路经济带旅游效率研究[J].经济问题探索,2015,36(7):14-17.

[14] 吴芳梅,曾冰.环境约束下民族地区旅游经济效率及其影响因素研究[J].经济问题探索,2016(7):177-184.

[15] 唐睿,冯学钢.中国入境旅游效率测算及影响因素——基于“一带一路”沿线国家随机前沿引力模型的实证[J].经济问题探索,2018,39(7):60-67.

[16] 王凯,甘畅,王梦晗,等.湖北省旅游扶贫效率时空格局及其影响因素[J].长江流域资源与环境,2019,28(4):863-871.

[17] 程慧,徐琼.我国旅游扶贫效率的时空差异及其驱动因素研究[J].湖南财政经济学院学报,2019,35(1):83-92.

[18] 方叶林,黄震方,王芳,等.中国大陆省际旅游效率时空演化及其俱乐部趋同研究[J].地理科学进展,2018,37(10):1392-1404.

[19] 徐冬,黄震方,胡小海,等.浙江省县域旅游效率空间格局演变及其影响因素[J].经济地理,2018,38(5):197-207.

[20] 王坤,黄震方,陶玉国,等.区域城市旅游效率的空间特征及溢出效应分析——以长三角为例[J].经济地理,2013,33(4):161-167.

[21] 马丽君,龙云.基于社会网络分析法的中国省际入境旅游经济增长空间关联性[J].地理科学,2017,37(11):1705-1711.

[22] 黄杰.中国能源环境效率的空间关联网络结构及其影响因素[J].资源科学,2018,40(4):759-772.

[23] 刘佳,陆菊,刘宁.基于DEA-Malmquist模型的中国沿海地区旅游产业效率时空演化、影响因素与形成机理[J].资源科学,2015,37(12):2381-2393.

[24] 文彤,邱佳佳.旅游虚拟社区网络演化特征分析——以“马蜂窝”为例[J].地理与地理信息科学,2018,34(6):119-126.

[25] ZENG B D.Pattern of Chinese tourist flows in Japan:A social network analysis perspective[J].Tourism Geographies,2018,20(5):810-832.

[26] 刘华军,刘传明,孙亚男.中国能源消费的空间关联网络结构特征及其效应研究[J].中国工业经济,2015(5):83-95.

[27] WASSERMAN S,FAUST K.Social Network Analysis:Methods and Applications[M].London:Cambridge University Press,1994.40-186.

[28] 王坤,黄震方,曹芳东,等.泛长江三角洲城市旅游绩效空间格局演变及其影响因素[J].自然资源学报,2016,31(7):1149-1163.

[29] 曹芳东,黄震方,徐敏,等.风景名胜区旅游效率及其分解效率的时空格局与影响因素——基于Bootstrap-DEA模型的分析方法[J].地理研究,2015,34(12):2395-2408.

基本信息:

中图分类号:F592

引用信息:

[1]程慧,徐琼,郭尧琦.中国旅游效率的空间关联网络结构及其解释[J].地理与地理信息科学,2020,36(06):104-112.

基金信息:

国家社科基金青年项目(19CGL030)

检 索 高级检索

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文